Discover how new research is changing what’s possible for stroke survivors with little to no arm movement.
What if I told you that even if you can’t move your arm after a stroke, there are still powerful ways to promote recovery—and that some of the therapies we use might actually be making things worse?
That’s what I kept thinking after reading a 2024 review article published in Nature Reviews Neuroscience. The paper dove deep into what happens in the brain after a stroke, especially for people with severe motor impairments (meaning no movement at all in the arm). It confirmed a lot of what we already see clinically—but it also challenged some of the common strategies we use in neuro rehab.
Let me explain.
Why Some Therapies Might Not Work for Everyone
Many therapies are designed around this idea of “use it or lose it.” The more you move your arm, the more you activate the involved side of your brain, and the more the brain rewires in a positive way. That’s known as adaptive neuroplasticity. Makes sense, right?
But here’s the catch: that only works if you can move.
If you can’t, you’re left with what’s called maladaptive plasticity—basically, the brain re-routes motor control to the uninvolved side. Over time, that leads to more dominance of the healthy hemisphere and even inhibition of the damaged side. You can literally strengthen the wrong side of your brain.
This can create a trap for people with no movement: the longer they go without activating the affected side, the harder it becomes to get that side back online.
What Can We Do About It?
Here’s where the paper got really interesting. It introduced the idea of rebalancing—strategies that activate the affected hemisphere while dialing down the uninvolved side.
Some of the most promising techniques?
-
Mental imagery: Visualizing yourself performing a movement (like lifting your arm) can activate motor areas of the brain—even without any physical movement.
-
Action observation: Watching someone else do the movement (like in a video) can trigger similar activation in your own brain.
-
Electrical stimulation (e-stim): A lot of people think the benefit of e-stim is the movement it causes. But what’s really powerful is the sensory input. That little tingle lights up sensory areas in the brain, which feeds into motor areas and helps rebalance brain activity.
Now, let me add my clinical two cents.
I work with stroke survivors every day, and I’ve seen e-stim become part of their daily routine. But here’s the thing: you can build up a tolerance, and when you turn it off? Often, there’s no lasting change unless it’s combined with other things.
That’s why combining therapies might be the real game-changer.
Let’s Talk About Stacking Strategies
What if you paired e-stim with mental imagery? Imagine someone visualizing brushing their hair while their wrist is being stimulated. That kind of layered input could offer a stronger signal to the brain.
Or what about combining brain stimulation with CIMT (constraint-induced movement therapy)? CIMT already helps people who have some movement retrain their brain by forcing use of the affected arm. But if we added stimulation to suppress the uninvolved hemisphere and excite the damaged one, we might get even better results.
The paper talked about this concept of ipsilateral axon sprouting—basically, neighboring neurons growing new branches to take over for the damaged ones. That’s what we want. And rebalancing therapies might encourage that process more effectively than traditional movement-based approaches alone.
The Real-Life Impact of Immobilization
Here’s something that really hit home for me. The paper also reviewed what happens in healthy people’s brains when an arm is immobilized—like in a cast. Turns out, even in people with no stroke, you see changes in brain activity when you stop moving one arm.
Now think about what that means for someone who’s already had a stroke. Immobilization—whether from injury or lack of use—could make recovery even harder. And unfortunately, I see this happen all the time.
Just this week, someone I worked with had a fall and fractured their involved arm. No protective reflexes, no active movement to break the fall. Now it’s in a sling for six weeks—and that side was already weak.
I’m not a medical doctor, but I see the consequences of these injuries. Immobilizing a limb after a stroke doesn’t just impact the muscles—it shapes the brain. That’s why understanding how therapies affect brain activity is so important.
Bottom Line: Hope Doesn’t Start with Movement
If you take one thing away from this, let it be this:
Just because you don’t have movement doesn’t mean you don’t have options.
No movement doesn’t mean no hope.
Whether it’s visualizing movement, watching others move, using sensory stimulation, or stacking therapies—there are ways to stimulate the brain and promote recovery, even when the arm feels like dead weight.
We need to shift how we think about “doing therapy.” It’s not just about reps and tasks. It’s about feeding the brain the right input—and sometimes, that starts long before the first muscle fires.
Let me know what part of this resonated with you, or if you’ve tried any of these techniques. I’d love to hear how they worked for you—or if you’ve found other ways to “wake up” the involved side. We’re all learning together.
Articles you may be interested in
What is spasticity?
Spasticity is an involuntary muscle contraction caused by a hyperexcitability of the reflex arc that occurs due to damage to the brain or the spinal cord. Huh?? Yeah, agreed. Ok, I get it, keep it simple. Did you ever wonder why your leg seems to spaz out for no...
Mental Practice Helps Movement Recovery after a Stroke
Mental practice is a way of relearning movement (motor functions) by creating an image in your mind of the body performing that movement without the body actually moving. This method of enhancing performance and/or improving a motor skill has been used for decades in...